Subject	maybe 800+
Posted by	Spee on January 06, 2005 at 5:33 PM
	This message has been viewed 30 times.
In Reply To	emphasis on the plus sign... posted by BradZ (FL) on January 06, 2005 at 12:07 AM
Message	The Z32 has a true dual exhaust, meaning you basically have a seperate exhaust for each 1.5L of displacement on the motor. You don't need to more than a 2.5" exhaust to flow 1.5L of exhaust. The size of the exhaust piping determines the velocity at which the exhaust gasses leave the car. Allow the gasses to cool too much and/or slow down too much and you will lessen the performance of the car. Later, Spencer AIM: sbsTT14 PETZ member #4 '91 300ZX TT Stage IV+ '96 Jeep Cherokee Sport "also tired of ppl driving in a straight line for 1/4 mile and thinkin they're hot shit" - hey GotBo0st 22:17:26 09/26/04 JAMChitlen (8:01:35 PM): I vote to ban anyone who uses "hot" to describe anything other than a chick sbsTT14 (8:01:48 PM): 2nd "You are stupidier than dirt." - AzHeat 21:23:10 08/05/04 "Welcome, and I'd listen to Spee" - BigTDogg (MA) 18:21:41 02/17/04 "SCORE: Spee=1 The rest of us=0 (n/m)" - jaymztt(seWA) 19:17:12 07/23/04
Follow Ups	What's the magic HP number to warrant a 3" exhaust? (n/m) - mr. zed line 22:51:18 01/05/05 876.456rwhp (n/m) - Tissan© 22:52:17 01/05/05 i thought it was 879.666? (n/m) - Rbadger 22:55:38 01/05/05 no moron. (n/m) - Tissan© 22:59:04 01/05/05 Both wrong, it's 3000.0000006hp. :) (n/m) - ZFreak (Dallas) 23:04:45 01/05/05 1800rwhp (n/m) - SpooledUpZ 23:02:07 01/05/05 500+ (n/m) - BradZ (FL) 23:14:17 01/05/05 not on our cars. (n/m) - Spee 23:38:38 01/05/05 brad, spee, my post was not ment for you guys! - tecnobnz 23:43:10 01/05/05 emphasis on the plus sign... - BradZ (FL) 00:07:47 01/06/05 maybe 800+ - Spee 17:33:18 01/06/05 what the hell people.... he was asking for help - tecnobnz 23:42:15 01/05/05 Well think about it, we have full dual exhaust which means - YugoBernie (NoVA) 23:57:19 01/05/05 I haven't seen any dynos that say u will make less - Slowninja(GT-675 R Inconel Z) 00:07:12 01/06/05 You can imagine whatever you like. But the fact is that - YugoBernie (NoVA) 00:35:14 01/06/05 and reduce the velocity of the gas impulse flow (n/m) - CHUNG (Dallas) 01:08:25 01/06/05 Not to be a smartass but... - hades 01:07:11 01/06/05 39.25/78.5sqin? rofl (n/m) - Snoguitar 01:21:49 01/06/05 wow a mathlete. (n/m) - SaipanZ(MP) 01:45:35 01/06/05 You are hardly a smart ass. (n/m) - SactoTodd 02:15:04 01/06/05 No... - College Boy 02:17:59 01/06/05 9.81747703125 vs. 19.6349540625 (n/m) - Snoguitar 02:22:31 01/06/05 um..yes..what I typed :) (n/m) - College Boy 02:26:55 01/06/05 9.987 != 9.817. Can't see how you came up with 9.987, typo? (n/m) - Snoguitar 02:30:12 01/06/05 oops..typo..my bad..i make a lot of them..I was wondering - College Boy 13:27:48 01/06/05 So yes... - College Boy 02:24:07 01/06/05 What the hell are you talking about? - Marshall 10:46:47 01/06/05 You forgot it's radius, not diameter... that's your problemo - Scotts94z32 11:08:41 01/06/05 Wow! That's one big exhaust pipe (n/m) - NytWolf 12:25:31 01/06/05 Two 2.5" pipes flow slightly more than a single 3.5" pipe. (n/m) - Snoguitar 01:18:24 01/06/05 easy way to figure it out - Marshall 10:54:12 01/06/05 According to Garrett researchers... >>> - Scotts94z32 10:53:40 01/06/05
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.